FAT32, LILO, and LOADLIN

FAT32, LILO, and LOADLIN

Post by Timothy Lo » Wed, 25 Jun 1997 04:00:00



    Recently, I installed Linux on a friend's new system with Windows 95
OSR2 (which has the FAT32 filesystem).  Anyway, this system had a
major hardware failure, and is going to be replaced with a new system
similar to the old one, as mentioned in other posts.  Anyway, this
system had two FAT32 partitions (one primary, one logical in extended),
a Linux ext2 partition, and a Linux swap partition.  I had no problem
installing the FAT32 patch to make Linux read and write to FAT32
partitions.  Also, I had NO problem setting up LILO to boot either the
Linux partition, or the FAT32 partition.  I installed LILO on the master
boot record, and simply added the FAT32 partition as if it was a regular
DOS (FAT16) partition.  This worked great, and LILO had no problem
booting the FAT32 primary partition.  Now, here's what I want to ask.
I have read many posts that say using LILO with a FAT32 partition is
NOT safe.  Why is this the case?  Is something bad going to happen
eventually if I set up LILO again to boot a FAT32 partition?  Today I
upgraded LILO on my Linux system (an old Compaq 486--not the new
system in question) to release 20.  I read in the documentation that
came with LILO that it can boot any operating system.  The
documentation made no mention of FAT32, or problems using LILO
with it.  So, what's the deal here?  Is there anything wrong with using
LILO with a FAT32 partition, or is the author of LILO not correct about
his own software?  I'm getting a conflict in opinions here.  Personally,
I see NOTHING wrong with using LILO to boot a FAT32 partition.
   I realize that I could also use loadlin to boot Linux directly from DOS 7
on the FAT32 partition.  Also, I know how to use the config.sys boot
menu capability as an OS loader (use shell statement to load loadlin.exe).
Should I just use loadlin instead of LILO to handle the dual boot between
Linux and Windows 95?  I'm not a fan of boot disks, so using a boot disk
to boot Linux is not something I'm considering as a perminent way of
setting up the system (I'd only use a LILO boot disk for back up purposes).
I want to know if using loadlin to boot Linux from the FAT32 partition would
give me any advantages over using LILO to boot the both the Linux and
FAT32 partitions.  All comments are welcome.  Thanks.

 
 
 

FAT32, LILO, and LOADLIN

Post by Marlo » Fri, 27 Jun 1997 04:00:00



>     Recently, I installed Linux on a friend's new system with Windows
> 95
> OSR2 (which has the FAT32 filesystem).  Anyway, this system had a
> major hardware failure, and is going to be replaced with a new system
> similar to the old one, as mentioned in other posts.  Anyway, this
> system had two FAT32 partitions (one primary, one logical in
> extended),
> a Linux ext2 partition, and a Linux swap partition.  I had no problem
> installing the FAT32 patch to make Linux read and write to FAT32
> partitions.
> Also, I had NO problem setting up LILO to boot either the
> Linux partition, or the FAT32 partition.  I installed LILO on the
> master
> boot record, and simply added the FAT32 partition as if it was a
> regular
> DOS (FAT16) partition.  This worked great, and LILO had no problem
> booting the FAT32 primary partition.

I have tried to do the same, but when I use "setup" under Linux to
changesystem,
for some reason it does see my FAT32 partition, so I can't add it to my
lilo setup.
It only sees my DOS FAT16 partion. So, it appears to me that I could
only boot my
DOS partition and Linux with lilo. Can you tell mehow you got it to boot
your FAT32 partition????

[SNIP]

Quote:>    I realize that I could also use loadlin to boot Linux directly from
> DOS 7
> on the FAT32 partition.  Also, I know how to use the config.sys boot
> menu capability as an OS loader (use shell statement to load
> loadlin.exe)

I would also like to try boot this way. Can you tell me how to set up
myconfig.sys
to dual boot? I already know how to use lodlin, but how do I incorporate
it into
config.sys?

Quote:> Should I just use loadlin instead of LILO to handle the dual boot
> between
> Linux and Windows 95?  I'm not a fan of boot disks, so using a boot
> disk
> to boot Linux is not something I'm considering as a perminent way of
> setting up the system (I'd only use a LILO boot disk for back up
> purposes).
> I want to know if using loadlin to boot Linux from the FAT32 partition
> would
> give me any advantages over using LILO to boot the both the Linux and
> FAT32 partitions.  All comments are welcome.  Thanks.

Any response to to this question of "Is is safe to make lilo boot a
FAT32 partition"
would be greatly appreciated if it was forwarded my way.

Thanks in advance!

 
 
 

1. lilo vs loadlin on fat32 boots.

Hello linux world!

I have two hard drives hda and hdb.  hda is my linux drive with lilo
loaded; hdb is a disk drive who's os uses fat32.  I would like to use
lilo as the boot manarger for both os's.  Would the following lines work
to do this in lilo?

   other = /dev/hdb1
      table = /dev/hdb
      lable = win95

Or will I need to first boot dos and use loadlin to boot linux?

If you wish to reply to me via you will need to remove the NOSPAM.

Thank you for your time.

--

 Men never do evil so completely & cheerfully
 as when they do it with religious conviction.
                               - Blaise Pascal

2. ANNOUNCE: Plug-and-Play Linux development tree publicly accessible

3. FAT32, LILO, and LOADLIN

4. Help! XF86Config for 1412SL (Packard Bell) monitor.

5. Oh Woe is my lilo [going from loadlin to lilo almost ;(]

6. System admin scripts

7. Matrox Mystique ands X.

8. serial port problems

9. LILO vs LOADLIN

10. LILO vs LOADLIN (and CD-ROM detection)

11. LOADLIN vs LILO with W95

12. lilo or loadlin timing=

13. Loadlin works, LILO fails on ATA100