Red Hat vs. Slackware vs. Debian

Red Hat vs. Slackware vs. Debian

Post by Ryan A. O'Har » Thu, 10 Jul 1997 04:00:00



Hi all...

I have been using Red Hat for a short time that came with a Infomagic
6-disk Linux set. It also came with Slackware and Debian.

I am planning on re-configuring my linux system and have considered
trying a different version of Linux. What are the differences between
the three? Thanks!

Ryan

 
 
 

Red Hat vs. Slackware vs. Debian

Post by Andreas Jellingha » Thu, 10 Jul 1997 04:00:00


Quote:>I am planning on re-configuring my linux system and have considered
>trying a different version of Linux. What are the differences between
>the three? Thanks!

everyone has a different view of this.
that's how i see it :
a) slackware is old, well known and good. it's a small distribution
(compared to the other two), and if you started with slackware, then you
don't have to re-learn : not much has changed in the years (compared to
tha drastic changed in debian and redhat).

b) redhat is a big distribution with modern techics. it's aimed at the
"new to linux" user, and secondary at the advanced and proffessional
users.

c) debian is also a big distribution with modern technics. it's aimed
primary at the advanced and professional users, and secondary at the
"new to linux" users.

of course, debian has a special unique feature :
everything in debian is free. debian is not maintained by a company, but
by a group of developers around the world. and debian has a public bug
tracking system.  but that's more a religious feature.

summary :
slackware is old, good, small and wellknow. it hasn't changed very much.
redhat is new, big and hype. build with primary target new user.
debian is new, big and hype. build with primary target professional user.

regards, andreas

 
 
 

1. Slackware vs. Caldera vs. Red Hat vs. ...

I have just got a CD-ROM drive for my Linux Box and so I want to use a
CD distribution to install a more up to date distribution than I have at
present (Slakware 3.1).  In addition, it will be nice to have a search
through the software archives contained on many of the distributions.

So, should I stick with Slackware and get the 3.5, or should I get
something else?  My main criteria are the ease of networking (autodetect
hardware?) and the availability of software archives on the CDs.

Chelper

2. mounting an exported filesystem

3. Slackware vs SuSE vs Debian vs Redhat vs ....

4. Adding something to the path

5. Redhat vs Debian vs Yggdrasil vs Caldera vs ...

6. Q: DNS server via PPP?

7. Linux vs OS2 vs NT vs Win95 vs Multics vs PDP11 vs BSD geeks

8. Compaq PCI problems and 2.1.5 (Oh no, not again!)

9. "Official" Red Hat vs. Red Hat

10. Red Hat 5.0 vs. Red Hat 5.1

11. Red Hat Linux for $50 at RedHat.Com vs. Red Hat from LSL

12. RH vs. Slackware vs. Debian

13. Slackware Vs RedHat Vs Debian