Linux, big Conner disk & Disk Manager?

Linux, big Conner disk & Disk Manager?

Post by Bob Waltenspi » Fri, 05 Jan 1996 04:00:00



I have a large Conner disk (model CFA 1275, 1.278GB) on my DOS box.  I
would like to install Linux on two unused partitions.  I currently use
OnTrack's Disk Manager to allow the BIOS and DOS to allow access to the
entire disk.  DM is a Dynamic Drive Overlay that loads before boot.

Does anyone have experience with this kind of setup and can offer
suggestions for allowing Linux to pre-preboot Disk Manager?

Thanks.

=Bob Waltenspiel




 
 
 

Linux, big Conner disk & Disk Manager?

Post by Andries Brouw » Mon, 08 Jan 1996 04:00:00


: I have a large Conner disk (model CFA 1275, 1.278GB) on my DOS box.  I
: would like to install Linux on two unused partitions.  I currently use
: OnTrack's Disk Manager to allow the BIOS and DOS to allow access to the
: entire disk.

This question is answered more than once each day.
Throw off DM and confine DOS to 504MB, or upgrade to Linux 1.3.14
or newer.

 
 
 

Linux, big Conner disk & Disk Manager?

Post by David Kel » Tue, 09 Jan 1996 04:00:00


Way to go Mary!! You are exactly right with your analysis of the
situation. There are several to many catch-22's in this problem. There
is a very well thought out answer to this question by Donald Tetreault
under the heading "Linux and Ontrack" currently available  in this
newsgroup. I would like to correspond with you on this subject. I have
Dos/win and OS/2 with Ontrack v. 7.07 but have failed with Linux boot
kernels 1.2x from several distribution. I have been waiting to
received OS/2 back-up software and now am going to install  OnTrack
with bios standard format . Let's communicate via E-Mail.

david kelly

ashland,or

 
 
 

Linux, big Conner disk & Disk Manager?

Post by David Kel » Tue, 09 Jan 1996 04:00:00


Way to go Mary!! You are exactly right with your analysis of the
situation. There are several to many catch-22's in this problem. There
is a very well thought out answer to this question by Donald Tetreault
under the heading "Linux and Ontrack" currently available  in this
newsgroup. I would like to correspond with you on this subject. I have
Dos/win and OS/2 with Ontrack v. 7.07 but have failed with Linux boot
kernels 1.2x from several distribution. I have been waiting to
received OS/2 back-up software and now am going to install  OnTrack
with bios standard format . Let's communicate via E-Mail.

david kelly

ashland,or

 
 
 

Linux, big Conner disk & Disk Manager?

Post by Mary Conn » Tue, 09 Jan 1996 04:00:00




>: I have a large Conner disk (model CFA 1275, 1.278GB) on my DOS box.  I
>: would like to install Linux on two unused partitions.  I currently use
>: OnTrack's Disk Manager to allow the BIOS and DOS to allow access to the
>: entire disk.
>This question is answered more than once each day.
>Throw off DM and confine DOS to 504MB, or upgrade to Linux 1.3.14
>or newer.

I don't see it answered more than once each day, at least not
effectively.  I have the same situation, have read every post and
response for the last couple of days and still don't know what will
effectively work for me.  

Upgrading to Linux 1.3.14 is not going to help someone who is trying
to do a fresh install on such a large disk, since the installation
kernels are all 1.2.xx.  No one has yet said exactly what 1.3.14
offers, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether that path is
going to work.

Will fdisk properly partition my drive (claiming to have 32 heads)?
Do I still need to use the boot option of setting the hard disk
geometry or does 1.3.14 properly account for a drive that claims a
false geometry?  Can 1.3.14 read a DOS partition that uses the Disk
Manager's proprietary format or do you need to migrate the drive to
standard BIOS format with version 7?

If I have an ancient machine (nearly 4 years old), will all this still
work?

If there is documentation that covers all of this, please point me to
it as I'm not able to find anything helpful in the HowTo's.

--

 
 
 

1. big disk problems - or: big-disk problems?

Hi there!

I have really big problems. I try to set up a 45 GB Western Digital
Caviar 450AA (secondary IDE controller, master-drive). I patched my
machine with the recommended patch cluster which also contains patch no.
110202-01 for the ata-drivers. I am able to fdisk the drive with a
geometry file using fdisk with options. I am also able to partition the
disk with the native solaris 8 x86 format tool. I label the disk - fine
so far. But when I try to build a filesystem on it, newfs terminates wih
errors. I afterwards tried to set up a scsi-disk with 4,1 GB (IBM DCAS
34330). The same problem occured: newfs (as well as mkfs with options)
terminated with the following error message:

mkfs: bad value for size: 0 must be between 1024 and 0
mkfs: size reset to default 0
mkfs: bad value for ntrack: 6 must be between 1 and 0
mkfs: ntrack reset to default 16
seek error on sector -1: invalid argument

That's pretty strange, isn't it? I don't know wheter Solaris x86 is that
different from Solaris SPARC edition. Perhaps I'm too dumb to get this
machine working and should put my fingers off Solaris x86 edition.

Could anybody in this world help me? Or has anybody the same problems?
You know - it's just for my collegues: they are now calling me brad...

Greetings

SERGEJ

2. Embedded Code For ARM proccesor

3. HELPw/ Linux & Translating BIOS/EZ-Drive & Ontrack Disk Manager

4. Octave RPMs?

5. Read this pls, installating redhat 4.1 over 4.0 and keeping the metro-x server...

6. Maxtor disk or Conner disk

7. Questions regarding my C-shell script

8. Big, Big Very BIG SCSI DISK

9. NT4 & Linux on same big disk

10. 4 physical disks to the one big disk

11. Can I Use a big disk to replace a failed disk in VM

12. Install disc & software 1 & software 2 disc