signal 11 error when compiling kernel

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Alex La » Sat, 26 Jul 1997 04:00:00



hi all,

When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-

gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11

When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
break down somewhere else.

Any ideas ?
I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27

Thanks

Alex

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Michael P Cateline » Sat, 26 Jul 1997 04:00:00


Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.linux.misc: 25-Jul-97 signal 11 error when

Quote:> When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-

> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11

> When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
> break down somewhere else.

> Any ideas ?
> I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27

    This is a FAQ, read the SIGNAL-11 faq, in /usr/doc/FAQ on online.
Basically it's because of a memory or bus error.

happy trails,
-m

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Frank Sweetse » Sat, 26 Jul 1997 04:00:00



> hi all,

> When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-

> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11

> When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
> break down somewhere else.

> Any ideas ?
> I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27

Read http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11

--
Windows: I can play Doom!              |RedHat Linux 2.0.31pre-2 i486
Linux: I can be a file server, be a Web|Because reboots are for upgrades!
server, run the accounting package with|http://www.wpi.edu/~rasmusin/pgp.html
twelve terminals AND play Doom!        |for pgp key.        frank sweetser

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Dr. W » Sun, 27 Jul 1997 04:00:00



: > hi all,
: >
: > When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-
: >
: > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
: >
: > When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
: > break down somewhere else.
: >
: > Any ideas ?
: > I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27
: >

: Read http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11

Or install FreeBSD

(no flames...)

--
                  Linux/FreeBSD Fanatic: "NT = No Thanks"

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Frank Sweetse » Tue, 29 Jul 1997 04:00:00





> : > hi all,
> : >
> : > When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-
> : >
> : > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
> : >
> : > When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
> : > break down somewhere else.
> : >
> : > Any ideas ?
> : > I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27
> : >

> : Read http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11

> Or install FreeBSD

???

It sounds like he's got the classic bad memory problems.  How will
installing FreeBSD help with faulty SIMMs?

--
Windows: I can play Doom!              |RedHat Linux 2.0.31pre-2 i486
Linux: I can be a file server, be a Web|Because reboots are for upgrades!
server, run the accounting package with|http://www.wpi.edu/~rasmusin/pgp.html
twelve terminals AND play Doom!        |for pgp key.        frank sweetser

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Dr. W » Tue, 29 Jul 1997 04:00:00





: >
: > : > hi all,
: > : >
: > : > When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-
: > : >
: > : > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
: > : >
: > : > When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
: > : > break down somewhere else.
: > : >
: > : > Any ideas ?
: > : > I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27
: > : >
: >
: > : Read http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11
: >
: > Or install FreeBSD
: >

: ???

: It sounds like he's got the classic bad memory problems.  How will
: installing FreeBSD help with faulty SIMMs?

I really don't want to start in on this thread *again*, but I'll say this
much: why doesn't *BSD have these problems?  Yet almost 1 in 10 Linux machines
do?  

I know the old standard response:
 "Well, what do you expect when the OS is actually exploiting the
capabilities of the system"

Well, to that I say, "maybe it's going a bit too far???"

--
                  Linux/FreeBSD Fanatic: "NT = No Thanks"

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by David F » Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:00:00


] : It sounds like he's got the classic bad memory problems.  How will
] : installing FreeBSD help with faulty SIMMs?
]
] I really don't want to start in on this thread *again*, but I'll say
] this much: why doesn't *BSD have these problems?  Yet almost 1 in 10
] Linux machines do?
]
] I know the old standard response: "Well, what do you expect when the
] OS is actually exploiting the capabilities of the system"
]
] Well, to that I say, "maybe it's going a bit too far???"

An interesting question.  A quick check of DejaNews reveals that
people *do* get these signal 11 errors under FreeBSD.  I can dream
up a few hypothoses why it might be less frequent - fewer FreeBSD
users, more sophisticated FreeBSD users have better hardware, etc.
--
David Fox            http://www.cat.nyu.edu/fox            xoF divaD

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by David Magg » Fri, 01 Aug 1997 04:00:00



AL>When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-

AL>gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
AL>When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and will
  >break down somewhere else.

Alex,
A signal 11 error is hardware-related.  If you're comfortable
mucking around with your CMOS settings, check to see if you've
got an Auto Configuration option for Advanced Chipset (or similar).
If so, Enable it.  It sounds like you're memory access speed may
be a bit too fast.  Setting this lower may cure the problem.
Good luck,
David

 * OLX 2.1 * Think of a number tween 1 and 100, and keep it to yourslf

 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Frank Kle » Tue, 05 Aug 1997 04:00:00




>] : It sounds like he's got the classic bad memory problems.  How will
>] : installing FreeBSD help with faulty SIMMs?
>]
>] I really don't want to start in on this thread *again*, but I'll say
>] this much: why doesn't *BSD have these problems?  Yet almost 1 in 10
>] Linux machines do?
>]
>] I know the old standard response: "Well, what do you expect when the
>] OS is actually exploiting the capabilities of the system"
>]
>] Well, to that I say, "maybe it's going a bit too far???"

>An interesting question.  A quick check of DejaNews reveals that
>people *do* get these signal 11 errors under FreeBSD.  I can dream
>up a few hypothoses why it might be less frequent - fewer FreeBSD
>users, more sophisticated FreeBSD users have better hardware, etc.
>--

If you are using an EIDE-Controller on a 16-bit AT slot, try to
slow down IO-Timing for AT slots.
 
 
 

signal 11 error when compiling kernel

Post by Anthony Florend » Wed, 06 Aug 1997 04:00:00


I understand that Signal 11 is a memory-cpu coordination problem.
I had the same problem with an AMD-K5-100 with 16MB.

We tried changing SIMMS, but the problem persisted.

What we did was to underclock the AMD-K5 from 100Mhz down to 90Mhz.
This fixed the problem.






> > : > hi all,
> > : >
> > : > When I compile the kernel, I get error like :-
> > : >
> > : > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
> > : >
> > : > When I type make again, it will go pass where the error occur and
will
> > : > break down somewhere else.
> > : >
> > : > Any ideas ?
> > : > I am using Red Had 4.1, gcc 2.7.2.1, Linux kernel 2.0.27
> > : >

> > : Read http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11

> > Or install FreeBSD

> ???

> It sounds like he's got the classic bad memory problems.  How will
> installing FreeBSD help with faulty SIMMs?

 
 
 

1. Kernel compiling error (Signal 11)

Hi All,

I'm currently having a problem compiling my kernel from Slakware 2.2
(kernel version 1.2.1)...

Problem: When compiling my kernel I get the following messages:

--- A _LOT_ of lines like: gcc -D__KERNEL__ etc etc... ---

gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-1.2.1/include -Wall
-Wstrict_prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -m386 -c uart8650.c
cpp: output pipe has been closed
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
make[2]: *** [uart8650.o] error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-1.2.1/drivers/sound'
make[1]: *** [driversubdirs] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-1.2.1/drivers'
make: *** [Linuxsubdirs] Error 127

#

This error _doesn't_ occure at the same point/file everytime, so this
time it occured at uart8650, but next time it will occure at a whole
other point in the compiling process..  

Most of the time it compiles for about 45 min to 1 hour before that
signal 11 error comes up..

What I have tried:

* reading all HOWTO's and other FAQ, found nothing about it.
* Adding wait states to my memory.
* I've ripped out my simm bank filled with 256Kb simms, so what's
left are the   origional 4* 1Mb simms which are the same speed/model
etc etc
* patch upgrading to kernel 1.2.8 which worked fine (no *.rej file,
but still   that signal 11 error!)
* all other pre-compile commando's work fine (make config and make
dep and   make clean)
* I've compiled other (less BIG) things which went OK..
* Various configurations (incl or excl 486 optimization, incl or excl
sound     driver etc )..

My machine:

The PC which I use to compile and run Linux is an AMD 386/40 Mhz, 5
Mb RAM (4* 1Mb + 4* 256Kb), no 387, an Adaptec 1542C , and IDE
controller just for my IDE-CDROM, 3com etherlink III adapter, an 540
Mb SCSI-2 HD, a pretty shabby VGA card, an SBPro (1) and a couple of
cards which aren't used by linux (FM radio card, and an Telephone
card/Answering machine) and an Colorado 250Mb tape streamer (without
controller, so it's connected at the FD-controller).. As far as I
know I don't have any IRQ or IO-port conflicts left..

I use a partition of about 160Mb for Linux and a swap drive of about
16Mb..

When I just run Linux it runs great, it detects all my hardware
(excluding those weird cards ofcourse like FM and Answering Machine,
which is fine to me)
But it doesn't detect my SBpro and that's a reason why I want to
compile a new kernel..

The symbolic links to the various directories are in place, the gcc
version I use is 2.6.3..

If someone PLEASE could help me with this error, cause I don't know
anything else to try, if someone needs more information about
anything please let me know..


2. Best Linux PC components?

3. RH 5 Kernel compile error Fatal Signal 11

4. TEST! DON'T READ

5. Can't Compile Kernel // gcc 2.7.0 exits w/ fatal error: signal 11

6. CodeWarrior AND linux

7. SLS Compile Signal 11 Error

8. D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card

9. GCC fatal signal 11 error (compiling 2.0.35)

10. signal 11 during kernel compile -- will this solve it??

11. Signal 11 on kernel compile: SOLVED!

12. fatal signal 11 on cc1 everytime i try to compile a kernel..

13. Dealing with signal 4/11 - Kernel compile