Slak96 problem: Read-only FS

Slak96 problem: Read-only FS

Post by Pat Rundal » Mon, 28 Oct 1996 03:00:00



I downloaded slakware 96 (3.1.0) last week and installed
(successfully I guess) on a DELL Latitude LM laptop with a
1.3 GB harddrive partitioned 700 MB for WIN 95 and the
rest for Linux (20 MB swap).

I then installed LILO (just as I have on other systems) and
tried to boot.  When it comes up it says Linux 0.99.15 (or
some such ancient kernal) and it looks like during the boot
that the /etc/mtab could not be written to. Anything I do
gives me a permissions error.

Does anyone know what's going on?  I've not had this problem
on other installations.  Do I need to repartition the HD
because of this cylinder limit I've read about?  (OWWW!)

Many thanks,

Pat

---------------------------------------------------------------
 Patrick Rundall                                              

---------------  M   O   T   O   R   O   L   A  ---------------

 
 
 

Slak96 problem: Read-only FS

Post by Pat Rundal » Tue, 29 Oct 1996 04:00:00


Never one to bow to the pressures of netiquitte, I'll respond to
my own post.  It looks like the problem was that I was attempting
to put Linux past the 528MB barrier.  Based on nearly all the
install docs I had read (some of which should be updated to cover
this issue!!), I made a ~700MB Win95 partition and made the next
partition Linux native.  On my HD, Linux was still below the
1024th cylinder which I read in various HOW-TOs was the limit, but
in fact the limit (at least I've found) appears to be 528Mb.

The difference between my setup and that of some of the how-to
authors must be the heads/sectors/cylinders ratio.  

Lesson learned!

Pat


> I downloaded slakware 96 (3.1.0) last week and installed
> (successfully I guess) on a DELL Latitude LM laptop with a
> 1.3 GB harddrive partitioned 700 MB for WIN 95 and the
> rest for Linux (20 MB swap).

> I then installed LILO (just as I have on other systems) and
> tried to boot.  When it comes up it says Linux 0.99.15 (or
> some such ancient kernal) and it looks like during the boot
> that the /etc/mtab could not be written to. Anything I do
> gives me a permissions error.

> Does anyone know what's going on?  I've not had this problem
> on other installations.  Do I need to repartition the HD
> because of this cylinder limit I've read about?  (OWWW!)

> Many thanks,

> Pat

> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>  Patrick Rundall

> ---------------  M   O   T   O   R   O   L   A  ---------------


 
 
 

Slak96 problem: Read-only FS

Post by Len Bayl » Wed, 30 Oct 1996 04:00:00




>Subject: Slak96 problem: Read-only FS
>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 11:05:32 -0600

Rem out the pcmcia stuff in the rc.S file.  It needs to be placed later in the
rc files.

len

>I downloaded slakware 96 (3.1.0) last week and installed
>(successfully I guess) on a DELL Latitude LM laptop with a
>1.3 GB harddrive partitioned 700 MB for WIN 95 and the
>rest for Linux (20 MB swap).
>I then installed LILO (just as I have on other systems) and
>tried to boot.  When it comes up it says Linux 0.99.15 (or
>some such ancient kernal) and it looks like during the boot
>that the /etc/mtab could not be written to. Anything I do
>gives me a permissions error.
>Does anyone know what's going on?  I've not had this problem
>on other installations.  Do I need to repartition the HD
>because of this cylinder limit I've read about?  (OWWW!)
>Many thanks,
>Pat
>---------------------------------------------------------------
> Patrick Rundall                                              

>---------------  M   O   T   O   R   O   L   A  ---------------

 
 
 

Slak96 problem: Read-only FS

Post by Pat Rundal » Mon, 04 Nov 1996 04:00:00


Many thanks - this did indeed solve my problem.
Only remaining problem I have now is that neither XFree86
nor the commercial X-server vendors (Metro-X, Accelerated X)
support the graphics on the Dell Latitude LM (the increasingly
popular NeoMagic NM2070).  X-inside is closest to getting it
working, but I'm not sure I'm willing to shell out $100 for
"close".

Anyway, thanks for solving this bug (which I'm suprised doesn't
bite more people).

Pat



> Rem out the pcmcia stuff in the rc.S file.  It needs to be placed
> later in the rc files.

> len

> >I downloaded slakware 96 (3.1.0) last week and installed
> >(successfully I guess) on a DELL Latitude LM laptop with a
> >1.3 GB harddrive partitioned 700 MB for WIN 95 and the
> >rest for Linux (20 MB swap).

> >I then installed LILO (just as I have on other systems) and
> >tried to boot.  When it comes up it says Linux 0.99.15 (or
> >some such ancient kernal) and it looks like during the boot
> >that the /etc/mtab could not be written to. Anything I do
> >gives me a permissions error.

> >Does anyone know what's going on?  I've not had this problem
> >on other installations.  Do I need to repartition the HD
> >because of this cylinder limit I've read about?  (OWWW!)

> >Many thanks,

> >Pat

 
 
 

1. Read-only root file system - Slak96

After installing Slackware 96 on my Dell laptop, I get
errors indicating that the root filesystem is read-only
when I boot Linux. (Leaving me with a useless system Linux-wise).

When it boots is says "Welcome to Linux 0.99.15"
(after a bunch of errors which I think are related
to the read-only partition which say:
"_setutent: Can't open utmp file: No such file or
directory".

Here's the setup:
DELL Latitude LM-133 (P-133), 24MB Ram, 1.37 GB HD

I partitioned the HD using (DOS) fdisk into:

Disk /dev/hda: 64 heads, 63 sectors, 699 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot   Begin    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *        1        1      356   717644+   6  DOS 16-bit >=32M
/dev/hda2          357      357      679   651168   83  Linux native
/dev/hda3          680      680      699    40320   82  Linux swap

LILO looks to have been configured right. I even tried:
smartdrv /C
loadlin vmlinuz root=/dev/hda2 ro vga=3
(from the loadlin sample).   Boot disks lead me to the same place -
a read-only root file system.  

There must be something I'm just forgetting but I can't find it
in the docs (or didn't look in the right place).  

Do I have to change partition sizes or something (even though the
HD is only 699 cylinders)?

Any ideas?  Thanks

Pat

2. Flowe Desktop GUI environment for Linux

3. virtual read/write fs over read-only fs

4. Auditing in AIX

5. NFS fs read-only when mounted read-write

6. How to identify Graphics card on Ultra-30/60

7. Kyocera FS 1600 or FS 1600+ Printer drivers ( FS-1600 FS-1600+)

8. Setting up Video Card

9. Questions: read-only fs, nfsroot, enet booting

10. read-only fs

11. read-only FS

12. my root fs is not read-only

13. Solved!!! Re: [Help] read-only FS