Very Computer

by **heather..** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

Hi!

Does anyone know if there is a way to enable progressive jpegs in the
Gimp?

Thanks!

Heather Buch

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

by **<linux..** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

Quote:> Hi!

> Does anyone know if there is a way to enable progressive jpegs in the
> Gimp?

Gimp 1.1.17 will do it. Don't know about previous versions.

--
Matthew Vanecek
Visit my Website at http://mysite.directlink.net/linuxguy
For answers type: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
*****************************************************************
For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow
except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...

by **heather..** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

OK. But all of these 1.1.x versions are listed as "unstable" on the Gimp
web site. Which one would be the most stable of the unstable versions
(1.1.4, 1.1.7. or 1.1.11) and how unstable are they, really?

Thanks!

Heather Buch

> > Hi!

> > Does anyone know if there is a way to enable progressive jpegs in
the
> > Gimp?

> Gimp 1.1.17 will do it. Don't know about previous versions.

> --
> Matthew Vanecek
> Visit my Website at http://mysite.directlink.net/linuxguy
> For answers type: perl -e 'print

$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'

Quote:> *****************************************************************
> For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow
> except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

by **<linux..** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

Quote:> OK. But all of these 1.1.x versions are listed as "unstable" on the Gimp
> web site. Which one would be the most stable of the unstable versions
> (1.1.4, 1.1.7. or 1.1.11) and how unstable are they, really?

> Thanks!

> Heather Buch

AFAICT, they are stable. I use gimp 1.1.17 here, for basics like screenshots, photo editing, and the like. I've a tablet sitting over in the corner which I'll hook up once I take the time to configure my USB drivers. Basically, you generally get a stable product--that caveat is that the GIMP team will not admit that it's a stable release, and they reserve the right to make it unstable. 1.1.17 is safe, though, whatever the future holds.

--
Matthew Vanecek
Visit my Website at http://mysite.directlink.net/linuxguy
For answers type: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
*****************************************************************
For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow
except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...

by **Karl-Heinz Herrman** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

gimp1.1.18 seems pretty stable (latest I heard of is 1.1.19). I did
quite some picture editing lately and 1.1.18 was quite ok. Only
problem is saving preferences -- there it often dies of segfaults. But
once you got them saved (or defaults aren't that bad too) the picture
aditing, filter, etc. are fine.

There are quite a lot improvements to the gimp1.0.4 I don't want to
miss any more -- though 1.0.4 is *quite* stable.

K.-H.

--
-----------------------------------
Karl-Heinz Herrmann

-----------------------------------

Very Computer

progressive jpegs in gimp

progressive jpegs in gimp

progressive jpegs in gimp

progressive jpegs in gimp

progressive jpegs in gimp

progressive jpegs in gimp