Dual Hard drive -VS- One Partitioned one!!!

Dual Hard drive -VS- One Partitioned one!!!

Post by E-COL » Thu, 25 Jun 1998 04:00:00



I think the subject somes it up.  Tell me if I should use 2 or 1!!

 
 
 

Dual Hard drive -VS- One Partitioned one!!!

Post by Ashwin Biha » Thu, 25 Jun 1998 04:00:00



> I think the subject somes it up.  Tell me if I should use 2 or 1!!

It really doesn't make much of a difference..if you intend to use just 2
partitions one HD or the multiple HD's..and even if you created multiple
partitions on multiple HD's..it comes down to the same thing..you are free
to do whichever you choose..Regards

--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------\
|Ashwin Bihari                              University of Massachusetts Lowell|

|URL: http://come.to/linuxhelp                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| NOTE: The E-mail address on top has been mangled to stop Spam Bots..please  |
|       use the address in this box for replying.                             |
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------------/

 
 
 

Dual Hard drive -VS- One Partitioned one!!!

Post by George E. Waldr » Fri, 26 Jun 1998 04:00:00


Generally speaking, you will get better performance from multiple
drives.

Go to http://www.linux-howto.com/ and check out the HOWTO files.

There is one on large drives and another on multiple drives.  They do a
good job of laying out the issues, particularly wrt high/low activity
determinations.

They'll help you figure out how you should lay out your system for best
performance and stability.

HTH,

!^NavFont02F0151000FIGHHG45IG60HH52512C

--
 - George E. Waldron  at 06/25/98, 10:10
   Computers, by George!
   Naples, FL
   Using OUI 1.8 Pro
   See Weather or Not at http://members.xoom.com/edwaldron/

Systems Programmer:  A unique life form, powered by coffee and candy bars, easily distinguished by the fact that his checkbook is in HEX.
***
Opinions expressed are my own.  Any resemblance between them and the views of any rational being is purely coincidental.
***

 
 
 

Dual Hard drive -VS- One Partitioned one!!!

Post by [Lausan » Fri, 10 Jul 1998 04:00:00


Heh, how big are these drives? And how do you plan on using them (ie.
swap, native, other OS)?

A. Lausin
Disgruntled Linux Users' Group

 
 
 

1. Dual OS on one hdd: Win95 or Linux on the first partition?

There MUST be a DOS partition of some type as drive C:\.  You will want
to put Windows on your C: drive, which will be the first partition.  One
reason for this is that in Windows not all the initial boot parameters
are in the boot sector; some of them are in the first sector of the
drive.  I'm not sure what will happen if you try to have a non-DOS
partition as the first partition on the drive, and then having a DOS
partition as the second; if you are expirementing, why don't you try and
let the rest of us know.  

--
Matthew Vanecek
For professional Website hosting services, visit http://www.mjv.com
Studies in Business Computers at SAC, San Antonio, TX
Visit my Website at http://lonestar.texas.net/~vanec

For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow
except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...

2. iptables with kernel 2.4

3. How to merge two hard drive into one logical hard drive for Linux

4. Re-number the tags in file.

5. Zip drive Vs Syquest Vs regular tape drive : which one?

6. Is anyone working on scanner support?

7. Dual Drives Showing as One, Partitioning

8. CGI gateway for IBM CICS?

9. Installing 3 versions of linux on one hard drive - help me partition it please

10. fdisk won't see my first hard drive, it display partition as unknown type

11. Trouble mounting second partition of first hard drive

12. First drive SCSI - not seen as first drive

13. Dual NIC, One Cable one for NT Network...