Should patch installs update Linux version number?

Should patch installs update Linux version number?

Post by Patrick Reijn » Sun, 21 May 1995 04:00:00




Quote:>Hello everyone.
>I just installed the patches to upgrade my Linux kernel from
>version 1.2.3 to version 1.2.8 but when I reboot or use the
>command 'uname -r' I still get 1.2.3 as the current kernel.  
>Are the patches supposed to update the kernel version so that
>the 'uname -r' command should report 1.2.8?

Yes, and 1.2.8 is actually what uname -r is telling me after I patched
1.2.0 up to 1.2.8 ......

Quote:>Mike

Patrick Reijnen

--
************************* Patrick Reijnen *************************
*                                                        Linux    *

* WWW:    http://zeus.cs.kun.nl:4080/homepage.html                *

 
 
 

Should patch installs update Linux version number?

Post by Mike Hewit » Sun, 21 May 1995 04:00:00


Hello everyone.

I just installed the patches to upgrade my Linux kernel from
version 1.2.3 to version 1.2.8 but when I reboot or use the
command 'uname -r' I still get 1.2.3 as the current kernel.  
Are the patches supposed to update the kernel version so that
the 'uname -r' command should report 1.2.8?

Mike

 
 
 

Should patch installs update Linux version number?

Post by Andrew R. Tef » Tue, 23 May 1995 04:00:00



>I just installed the patches to upgrade my Linux kernel from
>version 1.2.3 to version 1.2.8 but when I reboot or use the
>command 'uname -r' I still get 1.2.3 as the current kernel.  
>Are the patches supposed to update the kernel version so that
>the 'uname -r' command should report 1.2.8?

Yes. You probably forgot to rerun lilo to boot the new kernel.

--


 
 
 

Should patch installs update Linux version number?

Post by Jim Van Zan » Wed, 24 May 1995 04:00:00



>Hello everyone.

>I just installed the patches to upgrade my Linux kernel from
>version 1.2.3 to version 1.2.8 but when I reboot or use the
>command 'uname -r' I still get 1.2.3 as the current kernel.  
>Are the patches supposed to update the kernel version so that
>the 'uname -r' command should report 1.2.8?

'uname -r' gives the version of the running kernel.

The first three lines of /usr/src/linux/Makefile give the version
of the kernel sources:  
          VERSION = 1
          PATCHLEVEL = 2
          SUBLEVEL = 8

I'll bet you haven't installed the new kernel.

After you compile the kernel, you have to either write it to a floppy
and boot off the floppy (type 'make zdisk' to make a floppy), or run
lilo afterwards to install the new kernel in /vmlinuz and inform the
boot pgm of the location (type 'make zlilo').  For insurance, you
should keep a copy of the previous kernel on a floppy so you can
recover from a problem.

                             - Jim Van Zandt

 
 
 

1. Installing new patch version w/o backing out old version

Say you have patch 100999-21 installed under Solaris 2.2.  Is it safe to
installpatch 100999-33 without first backing out 100999-21?  Is it safe in
the general case (that is, with any patch)?

--

  PGP2.3 public key available via keyserver, finger, or email.
  Member of the League for Programming Freedom and the ACLU.

2. Free Linux Books

3. Install a patch "cluster", can I removed older version of patches?

4. HP LaserJet 1100

5. Is it possible to build new libc and libutils to update version numbers on 2.2?

6. tcpip: config not working

7. Patch-1.3.90 didn't cgange internal version number

8. Xwindow

9. Same version number after a kernel patch

10. Updated version of patched Xaw3d-1.1: Xaw3d-1.1a

11. Version Update/Package Update

12. installed a new kernel, now "Symbol table has incorrect version number"

13. [4/4]: Ext2/3 updates: Update required e2fsprogs version