Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Adrian R Coo » Sat, 02 Jan 1999 04:00:00



Hello folks,

   I am trying to install a new 4.3 GB Caviar hard drive on my machine, and
apparently I need to use a piece of software called EZ-Drive to allow my
machine to see the whole drive. (It seems that my machine's BIOS doesn't
know how to deal with disks bigger than 2 GB: it's an old 486.) The Large
Disk Mini-HOWTO doc seems to say that Linux is compatible with EZ-Drive,
though only after kernel version 1.3.18 or something like that.

  Is anyone out there sucessfully using Linux with EZ-Drive? If so, what
distribution are you using (and what kernel version)? Did you have to jump
through any extra hoops to get it to work? I need to put Windows95 on the
disk along with Linux, and Win95 apparently needs EZ-Drive to be installed,
so doing away with EZ-Drive isn't an option. Just as an experiment I tried
installing an old distribution of Linux that I had (kernel v1.2.13) with
EZ-Drive already installed, and the Linux installer seemed to overwrite all
or part of EZ-Drive with LILO on the disk's master boot record, putting
things into a very weird state. I'm prepared to get a new distribution of
Linux, but only if I can be reasonably confident that it will work with
EZ-Drive.

Thanks in advance,
Adrian Cook

 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by James Donova » Sat, 02 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Hi,
?Unless WD has changed something since I installed a Caviar drive EZ drive
does not work with Unix based OS's
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Jim


> Hello folks,

> ?? I am trying to install a new 4.3 GB Caviar hard drive on my machine, and
> apparently I need to use a piece of software called EZ-Drive to allow my
> machine to see the whole drive. (It seems that my machine's BIOS doesn't
> know how to deal with disks bigger than 2 GB: it's an old 486.) The Large
> Disk Mini-HOWTO doc seems to say that Linux is compatible with EZ-Drive,
> though only after kernel version 1.3.18 or something like that.

> ? Is anyone out there sucessfully using Linux with EZ-Drive? If so, what
> distribution are you using (and what kernel version)? Did you have to jump
> through any extra hoops to get it to work? I need to put Windows95 on the
> disk along with Linux, and Win95 apparently needs EZ-Drive to be installed,
> so doing away with EZ-Drive isn't an option. Just as an experiment I tried
> installing an old distribution of Linux that I had (kernel v1.2.13) with
> EZ-Drive already installed, and the Linux installer seemed to overwrite all
> or part of EZ-Drive with LILO on the disk's master boot record, putting
> things into a very weird state. I'm prepared to get a new distribution of
> Linux, but only if I can be reasonably confident that it will work with
> EZ-Drive.

> Thanks in advance,
> Adrian Cook


?

 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Harry McGreg » Sat, 02 Jan 1999 04:00:00


On Fri, 01 Jan 1999 12:47:09 -0500, James Donovan


>Hi,
>?Unless WD has changed something since I installed a Caviar drive EZ drive
>does not work with Unix based OS's
>??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Jim

I have used EZ-Drive on my notebook for a while (2.1GB drive, dx33 NEC
notebook), it works great with LINUX, linux picks up that is's there
and everything.  I have had problems with LILO though, so I kept a
10MB dos part, and have l.oadlin setup via the config.sys.

Email me if you have any questions in this regard.

                        Harry

 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Gregg Ber » Sat, 02 Jan 1999 04:00:00



> Hi,
>  Unless WD has changed something since I installed a Caviar drive EZ drive
> does not work with Unix based OS's
>                                                                 Jim


> > Hello folks,

> >    I am trying to install a new 4.3 GB Caviar hard drive on my machine, and
> > apparently I need to use a piece of software called EZ-Drive to allow my
> > machine to see the whole drive. (It seems that my machine's BIOS doesn't
> > know how to deal with disks bigger than 2 GB: it's an old 486.) The Large
> > Disk Mini-HOWTO doc seems to say that Linux is compatible with EZ-Drive,
> > though only after kernel version 1.3.18 or something like that.

> >   Is anyone out there sucessfully using Linux with EZ-Drive? If so, what
> > distribution are you using (and what kernel version)? Did you have to jump
> > through any extra hoops to get it to work? I need to put Windows95 on the
> > disk along with Linux, and Win95 apparently needs EZ-Drive to be installed,
> > so doing away with EZ-Drive isn't an option. Just as an experiment I tried
> > installing an old distribution of Linux that I had (kernel v1.2.13) with
> > EZ-Drive already installed, and the Linux installer seemed to overwrite all
> > or part of EZ-Drive with LILO on the disk's master boot record, putting
> > things into a very weird state. I'm prepared to get a new distribution of
> > Linux, but only if I can be reasonably confident that it will work with
> > EZ-Drive.

> > Thanks in advance,
> > Adrian Cook


I have Linux working with EZ-Drive.   I lucked out though as I had linux
installed on
a seperate drive from the WD drive that EZ-Drive was handling.

I had a problem in that the version of ide.c in my kernel 2.0.35 did not support
the
remap EZ-Drive picked for my system.  (i.e. 240 heads/track).   As such fdisk
indicated that there was a logical to physical mismatch.   I worked up a patch
for
fix this problem and recompiled my kernel.  After recompile every thing worked
fine.  I am even able to use LILO to boot using MBR.

Several notes.

My patch had to be installed.  I had to boot from floppy initially with patch on

floppy version.   Then ran LILO setup.

NOTE...
EZ-Drive places a fake partition table and MBR on sector 0 of track 0 of the
drive
which causes EZ-Drive to be booted.  EZ-Drive then loads its driver and remaps
sector 1 of track 0 to sector 0 and then boots using the DOS (i.e. LILO)
MBR from
sector 1.

If Linux detects EZ-Drive Partition type it will automatically remap a request
for
sector 0 of track 0 to sector 1 of sector 0.  This should allow Linux to
properly
handle EZ-Drive disks.

I have  full access to the WD drive (my MS-DOG) partitions and it is set as the
active drive.

Regards,
Gregg Berg



[ ide.diff < 1K ]
--- ide.c.sav   Sat Jul 11 23:09:44 1998

 int ide_xlate_1024 (kdev_t i_rdev, int xparm, const char *msg)
 {
        ide_drive_t *drive;
-       static const byte head_vals[] = {4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 255, 0};
+       static const byte head_vals[] = {4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 240, 255, 0};
        const byte *heads = head_vals;
        unsigned long tracks;

 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Rinaldi J. Montess » Mon, 04 Jan 1999 04:00:00


I wish I had read this thread prior to installing Linux.

Fact is I repartitioned and reformatted my c:\ drive because of exactly the
conditions described above.  Also note:  EZ drive informed me my bios would not
recognize the (??) when in fact it would.

I have been running without it since installing dual boot with linux.

 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Eunnok Soh » Tue, 05 Jan 1999 04:00:00


i am using slackware v3.5 (w/ kernel 2.0.34).  i am using EZ-BIOS
which is the Maxtor variant of EZ-DRIVE.  Linux didn't do it w/
kernel 2.0.33, but it did w/ 2.0.34.  when you install LILO, have
linux put it on the superblock of the linux partition, and w/ FDISK,
make your linux parition the active one.  your computer should read
the first few tracks of the HD and read EZ-DRIVE, then it will boot
to the linux partition.

-Eunnok Sohn


> Hello folks,

>    I am trying to install a new 4.3 GB Caviar hard drive on my machine, and
> apparently I need to use a piece of software called EZ-Drive to allow my
> machine to see the whole drive. (It seems that my machine's BIOS doesn't
> know how to deal with disks bigger than 2 GB: it's an old 486.) The Large
> Disk Mini-HOWTO doc seems to say that Linux is compatible with EZ-Drive,
> though only after kernel version 1.3.18 or something like that.

>   Is anyone out there sucessfully using Linux with EZ-Drive? If so, what
> distribution are you using (and what kernel version)? Did you have to jump
> through any extra hoops to get it to work? I need to put Windows95 on the
> disk along with Linux, and Win95 apparently needs EZ-Drive to be installed,
> so doing away with EZ-Drive isn't an option. Just as an experiment I tried
> installing an old distribution of Linux that I had (kernel v1.2.13) with
> EZ-Drive already installed, and the Linux installer seemed to overwrite all
> or part of EZ-Drive with LILO on the disk's master boot record, putting
> things into a very weird state. I'm prepared to get a new distribution of
> Linux, but only if I can be reasonably confident that it will work with
> EZ-Drive.

> Thanks in advance,
> Adrian Cook


 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Fran » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00



> Hello folks,

>    I am trying to install a new 4.3 GB Caviar hard drive on my machine, and
> apparently I need to use a piece of software called EZ-Drive to allow my
> machine to see the whole drive. (It seems that my machine's BIOS doesn't
> know how to deal with disks bigger than 2 GB: it's an old 486.) The Large
> Disk Mini-HOWTO doc seems to say that Linux is compatible with EZ-Drive,
> though only after kernel version 1.3.18 or something like that.

>   Is anyone out there sucessfully using Linux with EZ-Drive? If so, what
> distribution are you using (and what kernel version)? Did you have to jump
> through any extra hoops to get it to work? I need to put Windows95 on the
> disk along with Linux, and Win95 apparently needs EZ-Drive to be installed,
> so doing away with EZ-Drive isn't an option. Just as an experiment I tried
> installing an old distribution of Linux that I had (kernel v1.2.13) with
> EZ-Drive already installed, and the Linux installer seemed to overwrite all
> or part of EZ-Drive with LILO on the disk's master boot record, putting
> things into a very weird state. I'm prepared to get a new distribution of
> Linux, but only if I can be reasonably confident that it will work with
> EZ-Drive.

> Thanks in advance,
> Adrian Cook


  hmmmm....
i too have an old 486 (1993 compaq cds) in which i put a 3.2G caviar, then
installed rh5.1 to it from the rh boot disk and cd-rom... never had to  do
anything with the bios...  doesn't linux take care of all that stuff?
 
 
 

Does Linux work with EZ-Drive?

Post by Michel Catuda » Wed, 13 Jan 1999 04:00:00



>   hmmmm....
> i too have an old 486 (1993 compaq cds) in which i put a 3.2G caviar, then
> installed rh5.1 to it from the rh boot disk and cd-rom... never had to  do
> anything with the bios...  doesn't linux take care of all that stuff?

Of course but if you need to boot anything past 512M you're screwed.
EZ-Drive, Ontrack or LBA are the only way to be able to boot past
the 1024 cylinder. Even NT in HPFS will crash if installed past the
1024 cylinder in a non LBA or disk manager mode. Other OS just won't boot.
If all you have on the machine is Linux then you don't need any disk
manager to go around the bios bug.

--
Tann du plantage avec Ti-Mou?
Alors essayez donc Linux ou OS/2
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.

 
 
 

1. Patritioning WD 8.4 GB drive and Linux and EZ-Drive/EZ-Bios

Hi

I just installed a Western Digital 8.4 GB drive on my Micron machine
with a Micronics M54Hi motherboard as the second drive.  This has the
PhoenixBIOS 4.04 which cannot support disks larger than 7.8 GB.  There
is a BIOS (v5.05) upgrade available from Micro Firmware but for $79!  I
installed the WD EZ-Drive software and it partitioned the drive in 4
with about 2.1 GB per partition.  I can see these partitions OK in Win95
(though I do have a spurious E: drive that cannot be accessed).

In Linux (RedHat 4.1 - yes, part of the reason of getting the new drive
was to upgrade to RH5.2), fdisk sees only the first partition of the hard
drive (as /dev/hdb1 with about 2.1GB) with the rest of the drive seen as one
partition with unknown type.  If I use linux fdisk to partition the disk
in what I _think_ is the same partitions as EZ-Drive used then Win95 sees
the first partition but cannot read the other three.  Repartitioning the
drive with EZ-Drive causes the original problem (i.e. can only see the two
partitions in Linux).  

I know Western Digital claims that EZ-Drive does not support Unix but
the Large Disk mini-HOWTO claims that Linux will work with EZ-Drive.  I
seem to be almost there.  Has anyone got this working or have any
suggestions?

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Leslie Groer

2. (RFC)Supermount 2

3. EZ-Drive EIDE Disk Manager / Linux works

4. Linux and Raid????

5. EZ-Drive + LILO + hdb DOS boot ???

6. CD Player not working

7. How do I install Linux in an old IDE 540Mb drive that uses Ez-drive?

8. NFS: Mounting common shares

9. Booting problems with EZ-Drive and 2 IDE hard drives.

10. Installation with Drive Overlay (EZ-DRIVE)?

11. ide-drive>1024 cylinders and EZ-drive, no way!!!!

12. Installing Linux with EZ-Drive BIOS

13. SyQuest EZ-Drive IDE & Linux?