What is the benefit of running "make clean" in between "make dep"
and "make bzImage"?
I ask cause I've seen this on a redhat tutorial, but is not stated in
the kernel readme.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
I ask cause I've seen this on a redhat tutorial, but is not stated in
the kernel readme.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
> I ask cause I've seen this on a redhat tutorial, but is not stated in
> the kernel readme.
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
Scott
-----
Support provided by Linuxgruven, Inc.
www.linuxgruven.com
314-727-0918
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
> I ask cause I've seen this on a redhat tutorial, but is not stated in
> the kernel readme.
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
Paul
-------
Support provided by Linuxgruven, Inc.
www.linuxgruven.com
314-727-0918
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
> What is the benefit of running "make clean"
in between "make dep"
--Quote:> and "make bzImage"?
> I ask cause I've seen this on a redhat tutorial, but is not stated in
> the kernel readme.
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
greatest power, the village idiot will come forth to be acclaimed the
leader.'"
> >What is the benefit of running "make clean" in between "make dep"
> >and "make bzImage"?
> >I ask cause I've seen this on a redhat tutorial, but is not stated in
> >the kernel readme.
> It cleans up the files from previous make round. Normally you don't want
> to do that, as leaving them will speed the compilation process up. Make
> is designed to only recompile those sections of source code that have
> changed since the previous time make was used, or the sections which are
> effected by a change in configuration. Normally make will insure that
> when you fi add a module to support a new network interface card, you
> won't waste CPU cycles by recompiling your audio modules. In principle.
> Now sometimes the dependancies in the makefile aren't 100% tight so that
> after a change make would not recompile every piece of source code
> effected by that change. That is were the make clean comes in. That
> cleans up all previously compiled sections, and makes sure everything is
> compiled and no stale .o files are included.
> So make clean may be usefull, but may also force you to longer compile
> times.
> --
> If a trainstation is the place where trains stop, what is a workstation?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Netherlands website: http://hermanbruijn.com
greatest power, the village idiot will come forth to be acclaimed the
leader.'"
1. General Kernel Compile Question
Just a question that has been circling my brain....
Hypothetically, a machine has Linux v2.2.14 with a whole bunch of modules
compiled and present in the /lib/modules/2.2.14 directory.
If kernel 2.2.18 get configured, compiled (make dep;make;make modules;make
modules_install), the modules get installed in /lib/modules/2.2.18.
Now, how do modules present in the /etc/conf.modules file get loaded from
the /lib/modules/2.2.18 directory... I'm assuming that v2.2.14 modules will
not work with 2.2.18...
I guessing there must be a symbolic link somewhere, but I can't find it on
my RH6.2 or 7.0 install..
Thanks in advance..
3. general question about compiling the kernel and modules
4. Mysql
5. general kernel compiling problems on 164SX
7. Newbie compile question for any program (general)
9. Compiling Pine on AIX 4.3.3 and some general questions
10. Qt compile problems and compiling in general
11. Mini-Linux Distribution Questions + General Questions + UMSDOS Questions
12. Six general Unix kernel questions
13. general kernel/driver question(s)