Ap Pro Versus Microsoft SQL Server 6.5

Ap Pro Versus Microsoft SQL Server 6.5

Post by Matri » Fri, 04 Oct 1996 04:00:00



Can Anyone give please Emal me stats that compare  :
Pick Ap Pro
 to
Microsoft's SQL Server 6.5


Thanks a million.

 
 
 

Ap Pro Versus Microsoft SQL Server 6.5

Post by jeff » Tue, 08 Oct 1996 04:00:00


: Can Anyone give please Emal me stats that compare  :
: Pick Ap Pro
:  to
: Microsoft's SQL Server 6.5


: Thanks a million.

FOr the longest time, SQL Server didn't support row-level locking.  If
that's still true, right there I think it disqualifies itself from seroius
use outside the departmental level.

jeff george

 
 
 

Ap Pro Versus Microsoft SQL Server 6.5

Post by bbogar » Thu, 10 Oct 1996 04:00:00




> : Can Anyone give please Emal me stats that compare  :
> : Pick Ap Pro
> :  to
> : Microsoft's SQL Server 6.5


> : Thanks a million.

> FOr the longest time, SQL Server didn't support row-level locking.  If
> that's still true, right there I think it disqualifies itself from seroius
> use outside the departmental level.

> jeff georgeI have heard that true record locking IS there in 6.5, but I can't find

the reference.
 
 
 

Ap Pro Versus Microsoft SQL Server 6.5

Post by Jim Scofiel » Fri, 11 Oct 1996 04:00:00


MS SQL does support Row-Level locking, but not as Pick-ies know it......
It is actually called Insert row-level locking, as it just locks at the row
level for inserts, and only briefly.  There is no way to check for a lock
status and return error message as in Pick.

Jim Scofield

P.S.  Supposedly Sybase SQL Anywhere supports the row level locking.





> > : Can Anyone give please Emal me stats that compare  :
> > : Pick Ap Pro
> > :  to
> > : Microsoft's SQL Server 6.5


> > : Thanks a million.

> > FOr the longest time, SQL Server didn't support row-level locking.  If
> > that's still true, right there I think it disqualifies itself from
seroius
> > use outside the departmental level.

> > jeff georgeI have heard that true record locking IS there in 6.5, but I
can't find
> the reference.