Has anyone completed any benchmarks comparing the performance of
conventional vs. direct path export on Oracle 7.3.4 or Oracle 8.0.4 (any
platform)? Any statistics would be gratefully received.
Dean Logan Wood.
by Dean Logan Woo » Sat, 17 Apr 1999 04:00:00
Dean Logan Wood.
by David N » Thu, 22 Apr 1999 04:00:00
direct path could be 4X faster. (p.s. however, tt is less stable)
David Ng
> Dean Logan Wood.
by Joe Kazimierczy » Thu, 22 Apr 1999 04:00:00
> direct path could be 4X faster. (p.s. however, tt is less stable)
> David Ng
> > Has anyone completed any benchmarks comparing the performance of
> > conventional vs. direct path export on Oracle 7.3.4 or Oracle 8.0.4 (any
> > platform)? Any statistics would be gratefully received.
> > Dean Logan Wood.
1. DIRECT vs. CONVENTIONAL in Export
Is there are disadvantages in using DIRECT?
---------------
Andrey Dmitriev eFax: (978) 383-5892 Daytime: (917) 373-5417
AOL: NetComrade ICQ: 11340726 remove NSPAM to email
2. SQL Security Inside Client App
3. SQL*loader, Direct vs Conventional
4. Q: InterBase<->Delphi Key Fields Problem
5. Why export has conventional path?
6. MFC CRecordset/SQL/DISTINCT/ODBC
9. export in direct mode isn′t using direct read mode
10. Equivalent of Direct Path Insert with nologging
11. Direct Path Interface through OCI
12. SQLLoader with direct path?
13. parallel partitioned direct-path insert