PO on Rel 11i Beta

PO on Rel 11i Beta

Post by Thomas A. Perkins, C.P.M » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00



Hi,

Is anyone using 11i in pre-production release for the PO application?

We are researching the impact of an upgrade from 10.7 SC, and need more
than the public information disseminated by Oracle, if possible.

Thanks!

Tom Perkins
505.284.5999

 
 
 

PO on Rel 11i Beta

Post by bob sulliva » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00



Quote:> Is anyone using 11i in pre-production release for the PO application?

> We are researching the impact of an upgrade from 10.7 SC, and need more
> than the public information disseminated by Oracle, if possible.

We went from 10.7SC to 11.02, and it was a monster jump... It took
months for the user screams to die down to a dull roar... 10.7 to
11i is an even huger jump--two releases later.

Hope your upgrade goes well. Best of luck.

cheers,
~bob

 
 
 

PO on Rel 11i Beta

Post by Thomas A. Perkins, C.P.M » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00




> > Is anyone using 11i in pre-production release for the PO application?

> > We are researching the impact of an upgrade from 10.7 SC, and need more
> > than the public information disseminated by Oracle, if possible.

> We went from 10.7SC to 11.02, and it was a monster jump... It took
> months for the user screams to die down to a dull roar... 10.7 to
> 11i is an even huger jump--two releases later.

> Hope your upgrade goes well. Best of luck.

> cheers,
> ~bob

Bob,

Thanks for the [grim] input :-)  but wasn't the performance better?  Did
the users find any apps interfaces that had changed drastically?  It is
my understanding that most aspects "look" the same, but the background
processes (not to mention the 3-tier architecture) work much better in
most implementations.  So why were the users screaming?

Thanks - Tom

 
 
 

PO on Rel 11i Beta

Post by bob sulliva » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00



Quote:> Thanks for the [grim] input :-)  but wasn't the performance better?  

Actually, the performance took a major nosedive for us :(  Our
DBA/sysadmin spent about a month pulling out his hair, tuning
everything he could think of, trying to get better performance.
He brought in tuning consultants from Oracle Consulting, and
OS performance consultants from HP... It was pretty ugly for a
while there.

I don't know the specifics of the eventual fix (I'm just an
apps programmer), but it had something to do with the
R11 self-serve web apps hogging system resources... The good
news for you is that we upgraded to 11.02 in the first wave,
last year at about this time. We'd open TARs with Support,
and unfortunately, most of the Support people at that
point were less familiar with R11 than we were... Obviously,
that won't be the case with your upgrade, although if you
go to 11i soon after it's first released... Well, you may
experience something similar.

Quote:> Did
> the users find any apps interfaces that had changed drastically?  It is
> my understanding that most aspects "look" the same, but the background
> processes (not to mention the 3-tier architecture) work much better in
> most implementations.  So why were the users screaming?

The biggest change (apart from the initial performance problems)
was the switch to 'floating forms', i.e., each form you open
is in its own window. So as you open forms, when you eventually
get to the form you want, instead of having one Oracle Apps
icon down in the start bar tray, you have an icon for every
single form you've opened already. That takes a little getting
used to for users, but they do get acclimated to it after a while.
It's a bit more confusing when you've got more than one instance
up (production and development, for example)... I find myself
checking 'Help->About Oracle Apps' with just about every form
to make sure I'm working in the right instance...

As for performance overall, after the DBA figured out the problem
with the self-serve web apps, I'd say the performance is about
back to the point it was when we were on 10.7. Not noticeably
faster, IMO.

 
 
 

1. Attachments in PO Rel 11i

We are planning for an upgrade from 10.7SC to 11i.  One of our
challenges involves attachments such as Excel or Word documents.  Our
current version allows us to attach text, images and other files (such
as Excel or Word documents) to the requisition, and they pass through
normally to the PO as expected.

In the current version, they do not print with the PO even though they
have been designated "to supplier".  The only documents which actually
print through the standard Oracle interface are those created and saved
in Oracle text format.  (At this time, we are using a third-party
solution to make these documents print.)

The 11i "Statement of Direction" states "You can provide additional
information to audiences like approvers, buyers and supplier by
attaching text, URLs and files to the requisition.  These attachments
can be transferred through the system to purchase orders and other
documents."

Does anyone know if these documents (such as Excel or Word files) are
going to be printed by Oracle in 11i?  Or will they merely pass through
and stay as attachments (like they do now) but not be rendered by the
Oracle print routine?

Thanks in advance,

TP

2. How to ?

3. US-MD: Sr. Oracle Application Rel 11i Developers

4. Ascii 128 characters and higher with Oracle Thin Driver (where did the 8th bit go?)

5. US-PA-Pittsburg-ORACLE APPLICATIONS REL 11i - SofTec

6. Run DTSPackage from SQL Agent

7. US-PA-Pittsburg-Oracle Applications Rel 11i

8. FoxWin: regarding the TEXT menu pad...

9. US-PA-ORACLE APPLICATIONS 11I PO WITH REQ TO PAY EXPERIENCE

10. USA-IL-Functional 11i AP/PO Subject Matter Expert

11. US-MA-ORACLE APPLICATIONS 11I PO WITH REQ TO PAY EXPERIENCE

12. US-PA-11I FUNCTIONAL WITH PO AND INV