I understand they are different.. and I know how to manually find them.. bu=
t they took DBD::Pg out of the main list.. and if you use ppm on a activest=
ate box it also does not give you the choice to load DBD::Pg anymore... onl=
y DBD::PgPP. The DBD::PgPP doesn't need the pgsql libraries installed to u=
se it.. I've testing it on a windows box and am getting ready to test it on=
a hpux box. If it works then it is much simpler to install on a hpux box =
cause you don't need the libraries.
Travis
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] DBD::Pg & DBD::PgPP Cpan question
> All,
> I have noticed that they have replaced DBD::Pg with DBD::PgPP in cpan.=
=20
"They" haven't been doing anything of the sort, I hope ;-).
http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/
has the latest DBD::Pg version ...
> Also if you use windows PPM that you can't get DBD::Pg that way.. only
> DBD::PgPP.. I understand the difference between the two modules.. but is =
it
> really a replacement.. or 2 different modules.. in my mind its two
> different modules.. and they should both be listed. Has DBD::PgPP been
> tested?
They are very different modules. I have no idea about DBD::PgPP though.
Ian Barwick
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org