No, you wouldn't gain anything by manually spreading things over a RAID5. FG could be
considered if you foresee that you'll get separate physical partitions in the future.
Otherwise, try to make one db file per disk (i.e. 5 files in your case), to drive
disksubsystem reasonable optimal.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Please reply to the newsgroup only, not by email.
1. FILEGROUPS:table file groups and text file group differ
I created a new filegroup and now want to assign some tables to it. I
can
select the TABLE FILE GROUP and the TEXT FILE GROUP and select the new
filegroup name. The table is saved. However, when I reopen the table,
the TABLE FILE GROUP took the new name, but the TEXT FILE GROUP still
says "PRIMARY". Why won't the Text File Group accept the new filename?
3. Stripe data from RAID 5 & file group
5. TEMP DB's Physical File, How to remove one physical file from Primary File Group
7. RAID devices vs size of database file
8. Membership Roster and Resource Guice
9. Is RAID useful for Oracle database files?
10. Multiple files in file group
11. Reduce or eliminate file groups and files
13. Restore Query (File or File Group Backups)