We are new to the world of NT and SQL Server.
We are looking into build an application serving
500 concurrent users.
Is this feasible?
Should we play it safe and use UNIX...?
Help!
We are new to the world of NT and SQL Server.
We are looking into build an application serving
500 concurrent users.
Is this feasible?
Should we play it safe and use UNIX...?
Help!
Perfectly feasible. Look for machine with 2+ pentiums and 128Mb+ ramQuote:> We are new to the world of NT and SQL Server.
> We are looking into build an application serving
> 500 concurrent users.
Neil Pike (MCSE)
Protech Computing Ltd (MS Solution Provider)
Using Virtual Access 3.20 build 117a (32-bit) on Tue, 14 May 96 19:33
GMT
On NT Server 3.51 SP4 / Windows 95 SP1
> > We are new to the world of NT and SQL Server.
> > We are looking into build an application serving
> > 500 concurrent users.
> =
> Perfectly feasible. Look for machine with 2+ pentiums and 128Mb+ ram
> (or an alpha box). + a fast raid subsystem.
> =
> Neil Pike (MCSE)
> Protech Computing Ltd (MS Solution Provider)
> Using Virtual Access 3.20 build 117a (32-bit) on Tue, 14 May 96 19:33
> GMT
> On NT Server 3.51 SP4 / Windows 95 SP1k
______Iv=E1n Mingot Latorre_______________________________________________
Centro de proceso de Datos |http://www.ua.es/~Ivan.Mingot
Universidad de Alicante |
Alicante 03080 Espa=F1a/Spain | Un cordial saludo.
Telef / Phone: 96 590 34 00 Ext 3096 | Iv=E1n.
Fax : 96 590 34 64 | =
________________________________________________________________________
> Is this feasible?
> Should we play it safe and use UNIX...?
--
- Olav Tollefsen
- Microsoft Norway
-
- Author of News for Windows NT (http://www.ksedb.no/NTNews)
- Nothing I have written here is in any way, shape, or form official
- Microsoft policy or opinion, and should not be represented as such
- when quoted here or in any other forum.
> >We are new to the world of NT and SQL Server.
> >We are looking into build an application serving
> >500 concurrent users.
> >Is this feasible?
> >Should we play it safe and use UNIX...?
> >Help!
> It is feasible and it is being done. SQL Server's storage limitation
> is 4 terabytes I think so the rest is a question of architecture.
> There is actually a great article on this debate in last month's
> edition of Byte magazine.
Thank in Advance
Sameer
1. MS-SQL Server able to manage 500 GigaBytes with 400 concurrent users
Hello,
I'm looking for people who got experiences in the management of databases
with strong constraints (volume, number of concurrent users and response time).
Here are the caracteristics the database should respect :
- Operating system : Windows NT (or Unix)
- Database: either SQL Server6.5
or Oracle Server (or Oracle Enterprise Server).
- Volume : 350 GigaBytes
- Number of concurrent users : 100
- Response time : < 1 secondes.
This database is connected to an Intranet with an access at 64 kbit/s.
Does someone already install a database with such constraints ?
I'm not sure that a Windows NT-based server with SQL Server is the right
choice since SQL Server6.5 seems to not respect the main constraints
(volume and number of concurrent users).
If anybody has already encounter this problem, I will appreciate his point of
view.
Laurent.
2. US-IL-Chicago Sybase DBA Position - 100K plus
3. MS-SQL Server able to manage 500 gigabytes with 400 concurrent users
4. Index causes incorrect results in SQL Server 2000 SP3
5. Sqlserver 2000 Hardware Requirements for 500 concurrent users.
6. Replication between Access and SQL Server
7. DBMS selection for 500+GB and 500+users
9. DBMS Selection for 500+GB data and 500+ Users
10. Looking for large (500+ user) SQL Server SMP UNIX Sites